Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3


  • #2
    Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

    Patrick - you mention Aperture is superior to LR4 as LR doesn't have a true cloning tool: correction: LR does have it's own true cloning and spot removal tools - see screenshot.

    Once in the spot removal selection panel, You can choose between Clone and Heal brushes.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

      I would interested to know how the quality of RAW conversions compares. If not the best, LR4 is one of the best. Its noise management and sharpening abilities are really excellent these days. The ability to apply sharpening, noise reduction, white balance, etc. via the adjustments brush and graduated filter is also something I highly value. I am also very impressed with LR4's chromatic aberration reduction - at first I was not sure as gone were the adjustment sliders of the colours to correct, but now it just works without any user-input. LR4 is now a very mature product and camera updates usually come quickly, something Aperture has been criticised for. I don't use camera and lens profiles, but these would be icing on the cake for some users.

      There are improvements I would like to see; LR4's clone tool is limited to a circular brush area; the latest version of Cyberlink PhotoDirector lets you determine the shape of the clone area. I would also like to control more precisely the shape of selected areas that I want to apply adjustments to. A brush isn't precise enough; I want to draw the area and then fine tune size and feathering, etc. PhotoDirector's watermark editor and options are also much better than Lightroom's. Support for networked drives would also be nice.

      Ian
      Founder/editor
      Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
      Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
      Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
      Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

        Originally posted by theMusicMan View Post
        Patrick - you mention Aperture is superior to LR4 as LR doesn't have a true cloning tool: correction: LR does have it's own true cloning and spot removal tools - see screenshot.

        Once in the spot removal selection panel, You can choose between Clone and Heal brushes.

        I have not explained correctly or you have not read my post correctly. I am fully aware of LR's clone tool and healing brush, what I said was Apertures cloning and healing (they call it repair) tool is superior to LT's as it works the same as Photoshops tool. LR cloning tool is not designed for serious cloning work, but more for simple spot removal, in fact that is what Adobe name the tool.
        Nor do I say Aperture is in general superior to LT I have not at this stage been using it enough to make a judgement yet. There are definite plus & minus with both programs, I pointed out LR has very much better lens correction tool.

        Patrick

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

          Originally posted by Ian View Post
          I would interested to know how the quality of RAW conversions compares. If not the best, LR4 is one of the best. Its noise management and sharpening abilities are really excellent these days. The ability to apply sharpening, noise reduction, white balance, etc. via the adjustments brush and graduated filter is also something I highly value. I am also very impressed with LR4's chromatic aberration reduction - at first I was not sure as gone were the adjustment sliders of the colours to correct, but now it just works without any user-input. LR4 is now a very mature product and camera updates usually come quickly, something Aperture has been criticised for. I don't use camera and lens profiles, but these would be icing on the cake for some users.

          There are improvements I would like to see; LR4's clone tool is limited to a circular brush area; the latest version of Cyberlink PhotoDirector lets you determine the shape of the clone area. I would also like to control more precisely the shape of selected areas that I want to apply adjustments to. A brush isn't precise enough; I want to draw the area and then fine tune size and feathering, etc. PhotoDirector's watermark editor and options are also much better than Lightroom's. Support for networked drives would also be nice.

          Ian
          I haven't used Aperture enough yet to evaluate its ability to convert RAW files, I know LR to be first class, sharpening and noise reduction I the think again LR shades it. Adjustment tools, well Aperture has more, whether that's a good thing or not remains to be seen.
          Results are certainly slightly different, but again that could be me getting used to the program, after all I have been using LR from the very first version so I know my way about it better.
          Aperture 3 is now relatively old it was launched at much the same time as LT3 so what improvements will be made in version 4 will be interesting, in some ways LR4 was catching up with Aperture 3 the GPS & Book making facility's for example, but went ahead in other areas Lens correction and chromatic aberration reduction.
          The leap frog game.

          Will report again.


          Patrick

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

            Originally posted by Patrick View Post
            I have not explained correctly or you have not read my post correctly. I am fully aware of LR's clone tool and healing brush, what I said was Apertures cloning and healing (they call it repair) tool is superior to LT's as it works the same as Photoshops tool. LR cloning tool is not designed for serious cloning work, but more for simple spot removal, in fact that is what Adobe name the tool.
            Nor do I say Aperture is in general superior to LT I have not at this stage been using it enough to make a judgement yet. There are definite plus & minus with both programs, I pointed out LR has very much better lens correction tool.

            Patrick
            I know some prefer the PS healing tool, but I actually prefer the LR one - it works automatically like the healing tool, but you can very easily adjust the source area like a cloning tool. It's the best of both worlds if you ask me. The one advantage PS (the latest versions) have is content aware technology. I hope Adobe will eventually endow LR with that.

            Ian
            Founder/editor
            Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
            Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
            Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
            Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

              Originally posted by Ian View Post
              I know some prefer the PS healing tool, but I actually prefer the LR one - it works automatically like the healing tool, but you can very easily adjust the source area like a cloning tool. It's the best of both worlds if you ask me. The one advantage PS (the latest versions) have is content aware technology. I hope Adobe will eventually endow LR with that.

              Ian
              Hi Ian

              Yes the spot tool works really well at spotting, however I was adjusting an image taken in a studio where the back drop was not wide enough and stand legs and things were showing. In Aperture I was able to make good with cloning the whole height of the frame on both sides. Faced with this same situation in LR the spot tool could not do the job, I should have had to go into CS4.

              When I was playing with LR4 beta it was quick and responsive, however the retail version feels less responsive, very strange. Aperture has proved to be the slightly quicker of the two program's although they both appear to use a lot of computer recources.

              Patrick

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

                Originally posted by Ian View Post
                I would interested to know how the quality of RAW conversions compares. If not the best, LR4 is one of the best. Its noise management and sharpening abilities are really excellent these days. The ability to apply sharpening, noise reduction, white balance, etc. via the adjustments brush and graduated filter is also something I highly value. I am also very impressed with LR4's chromatic aberration reduction - at first I was not sure as gone were the adjustment sliders of the colours to correct, but now it just works without any user-input. LR4 is now a very mature product and camera updates usually come quickly, something Aperture has been criticised for. I don't use camera and lens profiles, but these would be icing on the cake for some users.

                There are improvements I would like to see; LR4's clone tool is limited to a circular brush area; the latest version of Cyberlink PhotoDirector lets you determine the shape of the clone area. I would also like to control more precisely the shape of selected areas that I want to apply adjustments to. A brush isn't precise enough; I want to draw the area and then fine tune size and feathering, etc. PhotoDirector's watermark editor and options are also much better than Lightroom's. Support for networked drives would also be nice.

                Ian
                Hi Taken me week, ( since retiring I seem to have less time than ever, very strange) but here are two versions of the same image, one processed in LT4 the other in Aperture 3 not asking you to guess which is which just evaluate and perhaps comment on any differences.
                I see a difference but can't say one to be better than the other, simply slightly different, I think if I have a preference its for the LT one on this particular type of image, I think I should like the Aperture if I were working on a portrait. That's the next test to be posted.

                Patrick
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Lightroom 4 & Aperture 3

                  Originally posted by Patrick View Post
                  Hi Taken me week, ( since retiring I seem to have less time than ever, very strange) but here are two versions of the same image, one processed in LT4 the other in Aperture 3 not asking you to guess which is which just evaluate and perhaps comment on any differences.
                  I see a difference but can't say one to be better than the other, simply slightly different, I think if I have a preference its for the LT one on this particular type of image, I think I should like the Aperture if I were working on a portrait. That's the next test to be posted.

                  Patrick
                  So here is a portrait developed in the two programs.

                  Patrick
                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X