Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poorly printer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UNSOLVED Poorly printer

    I have a six year old Canon MP600 print/scan/copy printer which has worked wonderfully whether using Canon or good quality compatible inks.

    However, recently I'm getting a lot of banding when I'm printing out images - whether on photo paper or greetings cards.

    I've cleaned, deep-cleaned (boy does that use the ink up), re-aligned the nozzles and am running out of ideas.

    So - is it time to bite the bullet and buy a new one?

    I keep looking at those new A3 printers, but not really sure that I'd use that facility a great deal. I'm also thinking that a dedicated photo printer could be better, if I could find a small flat bed scanner (I'm currently digitising quite a few collections for people) rather than getting another MFP.

    Carol
    http://carolannphotos.com

  • #2
    Re: Poorly printer

    The head may be gone if so it may be time to change your printer as it will cost as much to replace the head and new ink as will pay for a new printer

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Poorly printer

      We recently bought an Epson XP-202 printer/scanner for home use. I think it cost £39. It uses Epson dye-based print so it will prints photos well but document printing looks good. It's also wireless and you can print wirelesly from smart devices. This is the basic model without an LCD screen, but I'm very pleased with it.

      Ian
      Founder/editor
      Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
      Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
      Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
      Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Poorly printer

        I do have a dye-sub printer for the mobile portrait studio I take to craft fairs, prints absolutely cracking shots.

        I'm looking for a printer that will print on glossy photo cards - not sure whether to jump ship from Canon for an Epson though.

        Going to have to borrow Dave's printer tonight as I sold quite a few cards at the craft fair today - and have another tomorrow...

        Thanks

        Carol
        http://carolannphotos.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Poorly printer

          I used to be greatly into Epson printers due to print quality, but I jumped shipped awhile back to Brother. What won me over is that Brother printers don't rely on chipped cartridges - making it much easier to use third party inks (or, in my case, refillables). You don't have to worry about the printer claiming incompatible chips, because there are no chips. Even if you stick with regular OEM ink cartridges, they're typically not the thimble-sized ones that Epson try to sell us.

          In the old days, a standard Epson ink cartridge would contain over 10ml of ink (up to 17ml in some cases). Today a "standard" cartridge contains as little as 3.3ml of ink, and even their "high capacity" ones contain around 6ml of ink - that's barely 2/3rds of the old standard sized carts, yet they have the cheek to call it "high capacity". It's a bit of a con job on Epson's part (I'm not saying that other OEMs don't do it also, but I only used Epson printers at the time). How much ink is 3ml? Not even a teaspoon!

          I have several decent Epson printers here that haven't been used for several years due to ink costs. I don't know if it was their intention to chase their customers away, but that's what they've achieved. I would still be with Epson if not for their increasingly tiny ink cartridges and restrictive "chip" practices.

          If you do decide to go with Epson and intend to use OEM ink, check out the print cost first because you could be changing your cartridges every two minutes - every time you change one, all the others go through a purge process. The last time I used one of my Epsons, it spent its entire life with the "ink low" light flashing because one was always running low, and changing that one would force one of the others into an "ink-low" state. And that was when cartridges contained 10ml of ink - these current thimble-sized 3.3ml cartridges would probably be empty after a couple of headcleans.

          Be wary. Printer manufacturers sell their printers (relatively) cheap and make their money by selling us tiny droplets of ink using words like "high capacity".

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Poorly printer

            I think the best advice is to do your homework on any printer you are interested in. And it's the total cost of ownership which is the bottom line - how long you expect the printer will last, how many prints you expect to produce over the lifetime of the printer, the ink cartridge and cost options and of course the cost of buying the printer in the first place. You should also make an allowance for print quality.

            Pretty much all manufacturers, including Brother, make inexpensive to buy printers that can only be used with inks that will prove expensive if you use the printer a lot. If you do the research you will find mid-priced printers that are cheaper to run and more expensive printers that are even cheaper to run. That is the economics of the ink jet printer industry and Brother is not special in this respect.

            The Brother DCP-J140W wireless-capable printer scanner costs around £50 an its cartridges are about £9 for 270 pages (colour) - 3.3p per page or £18 for 300 pages (black) (Staples pricing), or 6p per page.

            The Epson Expression Home XP-202 is the equivalent model I went for at home for the children mainly to use and while I got a special deal at the time for £39 the typical price at the moment is £45. Colour ink cartridges (XL) are £13.50 - looks more epensive than Brother but the cost per print is 2.9p because the cartridge capacity is 470 pages. Black XL ink cost per page is 3.6p per page.

            So Brother isn't a guaranteed best value solution. On top of that I would argue that Epson print quality is better, for which I would happily pay some extra for.

            I don't doubt that Brother has printers with better value ink running costs but so does Epson. I expect both manufacturers' comparable printers will cost more, too. But both these sets of figures re meaningless without total cosy of ownership.

            Our Epson Workforce 4525 printer at the office cost five times as much as the home printer we have but by the time both printers get replaced I expect the office printer to have average a total cost per print (including cost of buying the printer) to be way below that of the home printer.

            Ian
            Founder/editor
            Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
            Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
            Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
            Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

            Comment


            • #7
              smaller
              Originally posted by Ian View Post
              On top of that I would argue that Epson print quality is better, for which I would happily pay some extra for.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Poorly printer

                That's given me quite a lot to think about, and thank you all for your help and assistance.

                Temporarily, I seem to have solved the problem by replacing all the inks and was able to print out a dozen cards for sale at the craft fair on Sunday. Sods law being what it is and having sold a lot of cards (and only one portrait) at the Saturday fair, this time it was the other way round - only 1 card (which I had printed the night before, a father's day card) but 27 portraits so it was the little dye-sub which was working overtime.

                However, I do realise that it looks like my old printer is coming to the end of its useful life but at least I have a month until the next craft fair to sort things out.

                So I'm going to do a lot of printing to use up all the inks I have in stock (that's what you get for bulk buying) and then look for a fairly high-end photo printer, keeping this one in reserve for black and white every-day stuff.

                Thanks again
                Carol
                http://carolannphotos.com

                Comment

                Working...
                X