Hi
I'm looking to upgrade my Canon 350D. In terms of lenses I have the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS and the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS. The two EF-S lenses only work with Canon's APS-C range of camera bodies obviously.
I'm reasonably happy with this setup but I'm hankering after faster, better quality optics i.e. Canon's "L" series. I'm also looking at the quality achieved by Canon 5D users but wondering how much of this is down to the L series lenses that are invariably attached, rather than the full-frame sensor.
I'm strictly amateur and don't specialise in any specific area of photography - I'll shoot, or attempt to shoot, anything. If I'm developing a slight preference, it's for wildlife photography, including macro. I like the improvement IS brings to my images. I'm still waiting to sell my first picture but it's not part of my financial planning
So a few "starter for 10" questions, and let's assume money is not an issue for the moment (although there are individuals in my house who think new carpets are more important than a new camera or lens - strange but true
). I should state that the EOS-1D range is NOT on my wish-list!
1) Should I Stick with APS-C or go full-frame with the 5D?
2) Is it "worth" putting L series lenses on an APS-C camera?
3) is the 400D a significant upgrade over the 350D? (I do suffer with dust on the sensor with the 350D - a real pain - has this been solved with the 400D?)
4) Is the 30D a significant upgrade over the 350D (I believe it's the same sensor)? Is this model due for replacement soon?
5) Should I just stick where I am for another 6 months (i.e. is the 30D likely to be replaced with a "40D" with the 400D's sensor?)
I'm looking to upgrade my Canon 350D. In terms of lenses I have the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS and the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS. The two EF-S lenses only work with Canon's APS-C range of camera bodies obviously.
I'm reasonably happy with this setup but I'm hankering after faster, better quality optics i.e. Canon's "L" series. I'm also looking at the quality achieved by Canon 5D users but wondering how much of this is down to the L series lenses that are invariably attached, rather than the full-frame sensor.
I'm strictly amateur and don't specialise in any specific area of photography - I'll shoot, or attempt to shoot, anything. If I'm developing a slight preference, it's for wildlife photography, including macro. I like the improvement IS brings to my images. I'm still waiting to sell my first picture but it's not part of my financial planning
So a few "starter for 10" questions, and let's assume money is not an issue for the moment (although there are individuals in my house who think new carpets are more important than a new camera or lens - strange but true
). I should state that the EOS-1D range is NOT on my wish-list!1) Should I Stick with APS-C or go full-frame with the 5D?
2) Is it "worth" putting L series lenses on an APS-C camera?
3) is the 400D a significant upgrade over the 350D? (I do suffer with dust on the sensor with the 350D - a real pain - has this been solved with the 400D?)
4) Is the 30D a significant upgrade over the 350D (I believe it's the same sensor)? Is this model due for replacement soon?
5) Should I just stick where I am for another 6 months (i.e. is the 30D likely to be replaced with a "40D" with the 400D's sensor?)
Carpets first please.
- of course, everything is IMHO.
Comment