Digital Photography Now - www.dpnow.com  
 
advertisements

Go Back   DPNow.com Discussion Forum > Image insight > Camera technique

Camera technique Questions and advice on how to improve your picture taking can be posted here. This board is discussion beyons the basics, which are catered for in the 'Help and advice for beginners' board.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-12
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 555
Thanks: 7
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked at 177 Times in 103 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David Morison is on a distinguished road
In flight exposure

I acquired a Canon 7D for Birds In Flight (BIF) shots and very pleased I am with the AF performance in these cases, but exposure can still cause a problem when the bird is against the sky. I have a preset which applies a exposure compensation value of + 1.33. This works well in sunny conditions for a medium tone bird but is not enough for a dark bird and too much for a light bird (Gull). The compensation needs to be greater against an overcast sky and the situation with different depths of colours in birds is even more difficult. So I have gone back to basics and do it totally manually using a Weston Master with incident light readings to guide me. Pretty successful so far but I am limited by the need to maintain a shutter speed of 1/1000 sec for decent feather detail and f7.1 or so to get enough DoF. So the only variable I have available is ISO, however I have not run into trouble so far with noise.

How many have found the need to return to manual non TTL metering for specific subjects, I'd be interested to hear other's experiences.

Regards

David
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-12
Pops's Avatar
Pops Pops is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,255
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 10
Liked at 62 Times in 52 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Pops is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

Birds in flight are often taken very quickly. You certainly don't get time to think about it. Wondered if you have ever tried shutter speed priority with auto iso
__________________
-------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-12
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hemel Hempstead UK
Posts: 10,168
Blog Entries: 282
Thanks: 92
Thanked 140 Times in 119 Posts
Likes: 396
Liked at 199 Times in 160 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Ian is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

I'm not a bird photography specialist but I have found that in the end unless you want a blown out sky I have to use the adjustment brush in Lightroom to bring up shadows to avoid silhouettes. Usually works well.

Ian
__________________
Founder/editor
Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-12
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 555
Thanks: 7
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked at 177 Times in 103 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David Morison is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

Yes I do use that setting for other types of bird photography but for birds against a sky (or a very dark background) TTL metering is not accurate enough. On a fast moving target it is impossible to get spot metering on the target and anything else takes too much of the light or dark background into account. Actually unless you have a rapidly changing cloud cover, the light levels change very little over a period so it isn't necessary to change the settings very often - this morning I was out for 1 and a half hours and the EV value changed only one third of a stop which is hardly significant. It actually takes me 5 seconds to look at the meter and another 5 to change the ISO rating, so it is not as slow as many may think. I've always argued that the ideal facility on a camera would be a switchable incident light meter that could be used instead of TTL, but being a quirky old eccentric living in the past no-one has listened to me.

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-10-12
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 555
Thanks: 7
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked at 177 Times in 103 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David Morison is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

Another conundrum: Using incident light readings on manual mode I can get correct exposure on all objects that are subject to the same lighting conditions, i.e. not under a tree. However if I lock the auto exposure setting on an object that doesn't include sky and then reframe on an object that has a substantial amount of sky around it I get a gross over exposure - even if that object is subject to the same lighting conditions as the original and the settings are identical! What is going on here?? Help.

David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-10-12
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada/Cheshire, England.
Posts: 200
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David M is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

With experience you can judge how much exposure compensation a shot needs and dial it in without taking your eye from the viewfinder.
__________________
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it. Terry Pratchett.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-10-12
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 555
Thanks: 7
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked at 177 Times in 103 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David Morison is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
With experience you can judge how much exposure compensation a shot needs and dial it in without taking your eye from the viewfinder.
Yes David I agree totally, but the point I'm making is that with incident light readings no compensation is required under stable lighting conditions.

David
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-10-12
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada/Cheshire, England.
Posts: 200
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked at 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 0
David M is on a distinguished road
Re: In flight exposure

I just don't see the point of using an incident light meter when you can dial in exposure compensation for your TTL metering.

I used incident metering for years when shooting medium and large format but don' recall ever using it with a camera with TTL metering.
__________________
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it. Terry Pratchett.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted - exposure meter mike_j For sale or wanted 0 09-11-10 02:46 PM
Exposure - which wrong is better? Ian Camera technique 3 24-06-09 12:10 PM
Over and under exposure - which is least destructive? DPNow DPNow Member blog updates 0 22-06-09 09:41 AM
Some long exposure shots Goatsmilkuk General discussion 1 05-04-08 07:25 PM
Week Three - Exposure Julia Julia's OU photo course 6 13-06-07 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Digital Photography Now, 2001-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger