Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canon 400d Question?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Canon 400d Question?
yep, down to the compression algorithm. quality is better as the sensor on the canon is (probably) physically larger and therefore produces less noise etc. you won't spot any difference between a 3mb jpg and a 4mb jpg.
i would suggest that you shoot RAW and invest in lightroom to get the best from the camera.
-
Re: Canon 400d Question?
Better image quality doesn't necessarily mean larger JPEG image files. In fact a bad, lower resolution image, which has more noise, will produce larger files as the image data compresses less efficiently.
But as has been said, JPEG image size differences are often down to the compression level applied by the camera.
IanFounder/editor
Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Comment
-
Re: Canon 400d Question?
You are batting on completely different wicket with the 400D, even though this camera is a entry level DSLR model its capable of extremely high quality results, particularly if you use RAW mode. There is no need at this stage to buy special software use that provided by Canon with the camera for conversion to get the feel of RAW. Then move on to Lightroom (excellent Program) or similar.Originally posted by PHILLCORNISH View Post
Hope you don't mind me commenting on your attached picture (this is note the a critique thread) but I know the area the picture was taken, just opposite the Jaguar plant. Couldn't you have included the whole of that wonderful representation of Spitfires, and I think you could crop of some of the bottom of the picture, its a clutter you don't need.
You have handled the night exposure very well.
Patrick
Comment
-
Re: Canon 400d Question?
Thanks all you guys for you comments. Thanks for the advice on above image Patrick as soon as I posted this image I could see this error in composition.Originally posted by Patrick View PostYou are batting on completely different wicket with the 400D, even though this camera is a entry level DSLR model its capable of extremely high quality results, particularly if you use RAW mode. There is no need at this stage to buy special software use that provided by Canon with the camera for conversion to get the feel of RAW. Then move on to Lightroom (excellent Program) or similar.
Hope you don't mind me commenting on your attached picture (this is note the a critique thread) but I know the area the picture was taken, just opposite the Jaguar plant. Couldn't you have included the whole of that wonderful representation of Spitfires, and I think you could crop of some of the bottom of the picture, its a clutter you don't need.
You have handled the night exposure very well.
Patrick
I welcome critique as I get a lot pleasure from taking photos and are always looking to improve. Will go and retry this same shot tonight and post it in critique for more comments.
Comment
-
Re: Canon 400d Question?
Please see my second photo of the above posted in the correct section for comment.
Here is where you can display your images and seek the comment, advice and, maybe, constructive critique of your work. Only post your images here if you are happy for frank feedback. If in doubt, use the beginners board instead. Only post your comments here if you feel you can make a constructive and polite contribution in response to what is, for some, a leap of faith in exposing their work to your critical comment.
Comment
Comment