JSR
01-11-06, 12:01 PM
I've just been looking over some of the PDFs at Wilhelm Research and I was left with a question regarding fading.
Most of my printing is colour glossies, so I'm mainly looking at Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper and I'm comparing Ultrachrome Hi-Gloss (R1800) and Ultrachrome K3 (3800/R2400/etc).
According to Wilhelm's figures, the Ultrachrome Hi-Gloss inkset is capable of better fade resistance than K3, except if the print is displayed unframed ("Bare bulb").
If framed under glass, UHG resists fading for 104 years, for K3 it's down to 85 years.
If framed under UV filter, UHG is listed at >175 years, for K3 it's down to 98 years.
If left unframed (bare-bulb), UHG is 34 years, K3 is 60 years.
How is it that UHG is significantly better at resisting fading than K3 if framed (either glass or UV filter), but K3 is significantly better if left exposed to the elements. What's different about the two Ultrachrome inksets that accounts for this?
Any clues?
Regards,
JSR
Most of my printing is colour glossies, so I'm mainly looking at Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper and I'm comparing Ultrachrome Hi-Gloss (R1800) and Ultrachrome K3 (3800/R2400/etc).
According to Wilhelm's figures, the Ultrachrome Hi-Gloss inkset is capable of better fade resistance than K3, except if the print is displayed unframed ("Bare bulb").
If framed under glass, UHG resists fading for 104 years, for K3 it's down to 85 years.
If framed under UV filter, UHG is listed at >175 years, for K3 it's down to 98 years.
If left unframed (bare-bulb), UHG is 34 years, K3 is 60 years.
How is it that UHG is significantly better at resisting fading than K3 if framed (either glass or UV filter), but K3 is significantly better if left exposed to the elements. What's different about the two Ultrachrome inksets that accounts for this?
Any clues?
Regards,
JSR